Web3 :The internet didn’t become global because computers got faster. It scaled because a simple, universal protocol — Internet Protocol (IP) — allowed data to move reliably between any two points on Earth. That shared fabric turned isolated networks into the modern internet.
Web3 never got that moment.
Instead, blockchain systems inherited networking ideas from the 1980s along with a mix of custom-built, ad-hoc solutions. Gossip protocols, mempools, data availability sampling, Turbine, Snow, Narwhal — each chain uses its own approach. The result is fragmentation, congestion, and bottlenecks the moment real activity shows up. Speeding up chains or increasing block sizes only treats the symptoms, not the cause.
At its core, Web3’s scaling problem isn’t execution. It’s data movement.
Why today’s networking model is holding Web3 back
Every Web2 application runs on TCP/IP, a universal standard that routes data efficiently across the globe. Web3 lacks anything comparable. Each blockchain operates like a small, self-contained network, optimized locally but unable to scale smoothly at a global level.
As the ecosystem grows — with rollups, app chains, AI agents, global settlement layers, and decentralized physical infrastructure networks (DePIN) — this weakness becomes impossible to ignore. Coordination between chains is slow. Data propagation is inefficient. Access often relies on centralized RPC providers, quietly reintroducing single points of failure.
Simply adding more chains or pushing for higher throughput won’t fix this. What’s missing is a modular, trustless, decentralized data protocol that all blockchains can share.
A mathematical path to real decentralization at scale
For decades, researchers have asked whether decentralized systems can ever match the performance of centralized ones — without sacrificing security or trustlessness. The answer, supported by years of research, is yes — but only if data movement is redesigned from the ground up.
This is where Random Linear Network Coding (RLNC) enters the picture. By mathematically optimizing how data is encoded, transmitted, and reconstructed, RLNC allows decentralized networks to fully utilize every available path instead of relying on rigid, single-route communication. Performance comes from math, not hardware. Coordination comes from code, not servers.
The key insight is simple but powerful: networks become stronger as they decentralize.
The use cases exposing Web3’s limits
Several fast-growing trends are pushing today’s infrastructure to the breaking point:
- Chain fragmentation: With over a hundred blockchains live, local scaling works — global coordination does not. A shared, coded data layer would act like an electric grid for blockchains, routing bandwidth where it’s needed without touching consensus.
- Trillion-dollar DeFi: Financial systems can’t operate at massive scale when networks collapse under peak load or rely on centralized gateways. A shared coded network could absorb spikes and distribute them across the ecosystem.
- Global DePIN networks: Millions of devices and sensors require flexible, multi-path communication. Slow, single-path networking simply won’t work.
- Decentralized AI: Training and coordinating AI across decentralized storage and compute demands fast, fault-tolerant data logistics — not just static storage.
The next leap for Web3
Every major leap in internet history followed a breakthrough in how data moves. IP enabled global connectivity. Broadband unlocked streaming and cloud computing. Mobile networks powered real-time social apps. GPUs accelerated AI. Smart contracts enabled programmable money.
A universal, decentralized data protocol could do the same for Web3. It wouldn’t replace blockchains — it would unlock their full potential.
Web3’s real TCP/IP moment hasn’t arrived yet. But when it does, scaling won’t be a debate anymore. It will be a given.
Also Read: Bank of Canada Sets Tough Stablecoin Rules Ahead of 2026 Framework
